Smart microscopy - adjustment of the acquisition parameters


This module explains the workflow for automatically improving image quality using feedback microscopy.

Insufficient image quality often caused by sub-optimal image analysis settings. In case of multiposition imaging of heterogeneous samples, it is hardly possible to set up optimal imaging parameters for each field of view. In case of cyclic or time-lapse imaging, optimal imaging settings might change over time due to the changes in the imaged samples.

Smart microscopy can make use of automated image analysis for scoring image quality (e.g. brightness, SNR, sharpness) and improving this score via adaptive control of critical image analysis parameters.


Prerequisites

Before starting this lesson, you should be familiar with:
  • Tool for designing Smart Microscopy workflows with the possibility for automated adjustment of light intensity, exposure time or other parameters influencing the average photon counts for the emitted light.

  • (Advanced/optional) automated control of objective correction collar or other parameters controlling image sharpness.

  • Image histogram

  • Signal-to-Noise ratio (SNR)

  • Intensity measurements


Learning Objectives

After completing this lesson, learners should be able to:
  • Learn how automated adjustment of imaging settings can improve image quality

  • Test workflows for automated improvement of SNR and image sharpness

Concept map

graph TD D("[M]: Acquire image with default settings") --> A("[A]: Calculate image quality score") A --> N("[M]: Acquire image with the improved settings") N --> M("Move to new position") M --> I("[M]: Acquire other images with the improved settings") I --> N

Figure


Figure 1. Hela Kyoto cells stained with anti-tubulin-FITC primary labelled antibody. Images are acquired on Zeiss LSM900 confocal microscope. Left image - default laser power. Right image - automatically adjusted laser power



Activities

Optimisation of image brightness

Set up the workflow for optimising image brightness and SNR using sample with fixed cells and stained microtubules


Show activity for:  

Zeiss ZEN Experiment Feedback

Introduction

Pre-requisites

  • Zeiss Imaging instrument (e.g. AxioObserver, LSM)
  • ZEN as the imaging control software
  • Smart Acquisition Toolkit

Detailed guidelines







Assessment

Questions

  1. Which parameters need to be automatically controlled for improving image SNR?
  2. Why optimal imaging settings can change for cyclic staining and time-lapse experiments?

Answers

  1. Laser power, exposure time, scanning speed, averaging, objective correction collar
  2. In cyclic staining-restaining experiments labelling efficiency might differ significantly between cycles due to differences in the labelling efficiency or biological reasons. In time-lapse experiments, morphology and signal strengh in the live specimen often change over time due to change of the sample itself or fluorescence bleaching.




Follow-up material

Recommended follow-up modules:

Learn more: